There’s nothing quite like four-and-a-half hours of televised perjury.
But that’s exactly what the American public got today as the House committee held its hearing on the Mitchell Report, with a focus on the conflict between Roger Clemens and Brian McNamee. It was every bit the circus that most figured it would be, if not more. In fact, it was a horrible day for Clemens, McNamee, Major League Baseball, Congress and nearly everyone touched by this saga. The only person coming out of this looking even a little bit good is the same guy who revealed that he used Human Growth Hormone in greater quantities than previously thought. When that’s the best you’re able to find, you know it was a rough day on the hill.
But that person is Andy Pettitte and he really is the key to today’s proceedings. Pettitte revealed that Clemens told him in either 1999 or 2000 that he was using HGH and when he brought up the subject again in 2005, Clemens said Pettitte must have misinterpreted (or ‘misremembered’ to use Clemens’ own word, which apparently is a real word, but sure sounds fake.) Clemens talking about his wife Debbie using it. Of course that took place in 2003 so in addition to having a heck of a fastball, Clemens can also apparently see the future. Shame he never saw today’s proceedings coming or he could have saved himself a major headache. Clemens also offered a rambling excuse about seeing a television program about older gentlemen improving their quality of life with HGH and suggested that was his only HGH conversation point.
None of this, however, carried greater weight than Pettitte’s testimony. You don’t want to get too worked over someone telling the truth under oath, but Pettitte’s unforced admission about a second run-in with HGH in 2004 added to his already high credibility. He obviously didn’t “misremember” because his wife recalled him telling her the same thing. Perhaps he misinterpreted Clemens, but whether the Rocket claims he was talking about his wife or some old guys he saw on TV, it’s a pretty big leap to believe Pettitte got either story confused with Clemens himself. So if he didn’t remember it wrong and he didn’t misinterpret it, the only thing left for the Clemens camp is that Pettitte is lying. And the only reason he would have to lie is to defend his friend. That’s not what he did. And that’s Clemens’ biggest problem.
Clemens can probably survive the Brian McNamee testimony, if for no other reason than McNamee is not the least bit likeable. He came off very poorly under the bright lights of Congress — much more so than most probably expected. He seemed to be someone willing to do seedy things in the seedy underbelly of the national pastime. The details of his threats of lawsuits, worthless PhD, requests for merchandise, willingness to use his star clients’ likenesses to sell himself all painted him in a very unfavorable light. And that doesn’t even take into account his history to lies, whether it be to police investigators, the media or feds. If this were a film, McNamee would have been played by a Steve Buscemi-type. Shifty, weasely and always in question. This is not a star witness and that probably will be the only thing that keeps Clemens out of jail.
Because as bad of a witness as McNamee is, the Pettitte testimony does lend credence to the idea that he is finally telling the truth. Chuck Knoblauch backed up his claims. Pettitte backed up his claims. Hell, even Debbie Clemens backed up his claims. The only one disputing them is Clemens, and not so conviently for the Rocket, he’s also the one with the most to lose. Why would McNamee tell the truth about Pettitte, tell the truth about Knoblauch and then lie about Clemens? It doesn’t make any sense. It took several hours but finally Elijah Cummings posed that very question to Clemens and not surprisingly, Clemens had no answer. It wasn’t the only time the Rocket dodged a question. Early in the proceedings, John Tierney repeatedly called Clemens out on inconsistencies within his own testimony, such as claiming to never have talked about HGH to McNamee despite his own heroic story of his outraged call to McNamee about his wife’s use. Clemens answered as if Tierney was asking him an entirely different question. I wonder if B-12 can be used to cure listening comprehension problems.
More problems for Clemens. Rep. Stephen Lynch presented an independent analysis of a “palpable mass” on Clemens’ buttocks. (And let’s be honest, there was way too much discussion of Clemens’ a$s today.) Without knowing who’s MRIs he was examining, a Dr. Mark Murphy concluded the mass was more compatible with Winstrol injections than B-12. Of course, Rep. Tom Davis nearly fell over himself to counter with a different analysis (I believe) provided by the Clemens’ camp. Davis even went as far as to call Lynch’s questioning of Clemens a “lynching.” How punny. How embarrassing.
And now seems to be as good a time as any to discuss the deplorable display by so many of our Congressmen and women in that room today. I try not to bring politics into a baseball blog, so if you’re easily offended by partisan chatter, you should probably skip the rest of this paragraph. If you’re still here, that can only mean that you know in your heart that the majority of the Republicans on this committee were an absolute disgrace today. From Christopher Shays making McNamee go step-by-step through a line of questioning that resulted in him being labeled a “drug dealer” to John Mica testing if Clemens or McNamee were color-blind as it pertained to the hues of B-12, Winstrol and HGH to Virginia Foxx asking Clemens if he noticed any difference in her Kinkos photo presentation, it was a bad afternoon for the GOP. Even more disgraceful, Foxx was the first person to go greet Clemens after the hearing. She should have been waiting backstage with a bouquet of flowers the way she glowed over his performance. However, the Democrats were far from perfect. I think it added a lot to the proceedings that Eleanor Holmes Norton thinks Clemens will go to heaven. Thanks for coming. And it’s a real shame that Clemens didn’t answer William Lacy Clay’s question about what hat Clemens would wear in the Hall of Fame. After today, that might have been our only chance to find out.
They were few and far between, but a few of these guys and girls did their homework and looked like respectable public servants. No one looked better than Elijah Cummings. He was a freakin’ rock star. He stuck to simple, clear facts from the testimony and pressed Clemens every step of the way. When time ran out on his 10 minutes at the beginning of the hearing, it was like Clemens had been saved by the bell. It was one of those bloodbath, first rounds where the only chance the fighter has is to regroup in his corner and hope his opponent punched himself out. To Clemens’ benefit, no one else had the punching power of Cummings. He was Mike Tyson in his prime. Everyone else was Glass Joe. When Cummings got a second shot at Clemens, he didn’t miss. This exchange was without a doubt the most powerful of the hearing.
“I’ve listened to you very carefully and I take you at your word. And you’re telling me that Andy Pettitte is an honest man, and his credibility is pretty much impeccable. You said you were misunderstood. But all I’m saying is, it’s hard to believe. It’s hard to believe your story.
I hate to say that. You’re one of my heroes. But it’s hard to believe you.”
Clemens was speechless and he looked as white as he’s accused Pettitte of looking when talking about HGH in 2005. If you only took one moment out of the entire four-and-a-half hours this would be it. And it came courtesy of Rep. Cummings. Maryland should be proud today.
Another Congressman who was very much on point was a Republican from Indiana named Mark Soulder. He addressed McNamee’s ever-escalating memory of steroid injections and noted that these type of miraculous recoveries of knowledge are not uncommon when dealing with cocaine dealers. It’s not necessarily a flattering comparison for McNamee but it does go to the point that just because someone is rather unsavory (and McNamee is) and has lied in the past (and McNamee has), it doesn’t mean he’s not telling the truth now when he’s under oath. And it helps explain why he’s been more forthcoming now than at any time previously. That’s the type of thoughtful analysis that all Congressmen should have been making.
But of course you only had to go to his fellow Republican from Indiana to find another Congressman using childlike judgments. Dan Burton came off rather naive during his five-minute grandstanding questioning of McNamee’s prior lies. At one point, he didn’t even know what he asking McNamee to confirm. So McNamee lied to reporters about steroids? I’m shocked. McNamee worked for someone he didn’t completely trust? Unbelievable. And Burton can be as insulted as he wants about McNamee’s previous lies when Clemens’ reputation is at stake, but forgive me if I’m wrong, but weren’t all those offensive lies to protect Clemens’ reputation? Pollyana has a new name and it’s Dan Burton.
There’s so much more to dissect. Bloody pants. A long-lost nanny. Clemens not knowing what a Vegan is. But the bottom line in all of this is you can’t come out of this thinking Clemens had a good day. In fact, I don’t think you can even believe Clemens at all, but I came to this from the perspective of someone who believes most major leaguers were and are on some sort of performance-enhancing drugs. So I’ll concede that someone predisposed to believing Clemens may not be completely swayed. But you’d still have to say this was a bad day. The best you could probably say for the Clemens camp is that McNamee continued to have serious credibility issues.
But Andy Pettitte did not. And as Henry Waxman pointed out in his closing remarks, Pettitte didn’t believe Clemens in 2005. It’s hard to believe him today.